I truly appreciate your technique of writing a blog. I added it to my bookmark site list and will

Is it better for Israel if America doesn’t attack Iran, or if it does? Well, it would seem like the general population can be told what they want to hear, to a dominant degree. There exists a great amount of anger at the Jews, and at the government, and they may want to preserve the reputation of Trump as a motive. We are seemingly now in a time when the equality of Jews, and toleration are not arguable, combined with the hostile feelings, may translate to a definitive condemnation.
I imagine in the realm of the Kingdom of G-d, for sure to get more people and nations to stand up for good things is better. In the financial realm, I would say the more power a movement has, the farther it can go. Justice for all the worlds unequal people, is a much more viable and powerful idea. So I guess we should promote standing up for whats right and reasonable, is a good thing. The American people can decide for themselves, if they don’t want another war for the Jews, which they pretend is isolationism.
Doesn’t the world to come begin to be initiated when America can no longer progress? I think it is the case that we are supposed to support and persuade them to keep pushing, as far as they are able. But don’t they eventually give up? Or recognize that they will eventually give up, so why not give up early, so that they can spare their people additional attacks by their enemies, and self harm?
I wonder if it can be said that the real jihad among the arab Muslim nations has been effectively co-opted? Does that mean the are resistant to western leftist egalitarian propaganda? Knowing that would be beneficial for Iran, but I don’t see how it can be confirmed.
My moms strategy is to always argue why should I care, why shouldn’t I have happy thoughts? I suppose, the solution, is to skip over the Aliya issue, and to say we can massively reduce war, crime, racism, murder and rape, if we can only get people to talk out their feelings of anger over inequality.
I wonder if I should post that usually at this time, America’s congress votes on a funding and emergency equipment bill. It would be good to see which congressmen and senator votes yae or nae. I decided to post.
Right now, human rights law in the world is not being followed, in large part because of the American and European people. We can restore human rights and standards to the world, but we need for Americans and Europeans to be more honest about the unequal world we live in, and we need for American and European media to stop censoring the fact that we live in an unequal world. Unequal financial achievements, correlates to unequal moral standards. Other factors like culture and religion can have a big effect on some communities, but financial achievement is a very good measurement.
The world should be divided into three categories as far as human rights are concerned. The refined world, the developing world, and the undeveloped world. I would put America, Europe, east Asia, and some other nations into the category of developed nations. This means we will apply a certain standard of behavior and laws on the part of their governments. Able to identify and criticize governments that curtail peoples freedom of speech, or freedom of the press.
The second world can be based on police commitments, laws, and initiatives. Like we can set standards for hunting down murderers, looking for serial rapists, pedophiles, fighting against corruption and vigilantly checkpoints. In this way, we can establish criteria we can expect and demand for different tiers of nations. We can gain a consensus, and prove with measurements, which governments and rulers are failing, and which ones are tyrannical.
In the final category I would put Africa, and about half the Muslim nations of the world. Excluding the gulf, Indonesia, and central Asia. Even there, we can reimplement standards.
As of right now, the UN members, trade favors, in order to exempt themselves from punishment for violating human rights standards. Separating from the world to establish a UN of democratic countries, doesn’t make sense, because we will establish rules for ourselves, that none of the rest of the world will follow. We will also not deal with the problem that caused the failure of the current United Nations. Namley, peoples willingness to make demands and pass laws, that are beyond the capabilities of huge percentages of people. They pass laws that do not correlate to people acting selfishly, nor do they acknowledge the morality of nations that rises and falls according to cycles. Nor do they give consideration to the first worlds demographics radically changing recently, into nations that host A first, second, and third world populations. In fluctuating percentages, with a downward direction. By advocating the establishment of a three tiered system, we force the world to take a step closer to competency and reality. Increasing the human rights of the people of the world. In G-d I trust.
I imagine Israel might be selling to the Gulf nations the rights to bomb certain Iranian locations. The real world is probably more immoral than people like to believe.