Do not imagine that freedom of speech is infinite, or always inherently moral. Look at the reality, the bigger picture, when possible and necessary. The Arab Muslims are riddled with hatred for the Jewish people, due to Jewish inequality. It overwhelms their minds, it promotes violence among their community, towards Jews. They are completely incapable of ending the Jewish desire for freedom, security, and sovereignty. That ship has already sailed, it is no longer possible to deny Jews those things from the Jewish nation, where they can defend themselves.
 With weapons of unlimited power that G-d has created, the Jewish people are capable of unleashing death in numbers that leaders of nations would not agree to. They have the motive to do so, because in the past, when confronted with Jewish inequality, or aspirations for dignity, gentiles who decided to war against the Jews always desired their complete extermination.
The situation with the white gentiles, is only more moderate, it is not fundamentally different. They are fully capable of war and desiring the extermination of the Jews. They in mass believe wildly untrue things as a society. Perhaps in the past they believed that Jews had horns, or would spread gentile blood on Matzas, or were responsible for killing their G-d. Today, just as easily, hundreds of millions of white Christians and secular whites, believe that Israel commits genocide, starves Gazans regardless if the Knesset approves that policy, targets hospitals for malicious reasons, targets civilians, schools, women and children.
The white Christians destroy their nations, their economies, their freedoms, for very stupid and immoral reasons. Why shouldn’t we consider that their free speech shouldn’t be regulated? Their society already forbids discussing non white inequality. Why shouldn’t we discuss if and how they discuss Jewish inequality? Feel free to put up for a vote, should racial inequality be free to discuss?
It is said that the gentiles are evil, from early in their youths. A nation that is majority immoral, and evil, will cling to negative philosophies, rejecting notions like more smart people make us all better off. Its not even entirely true, if those smart people belong to another identity group, that is abused by the majority, and may be exterminated or expelled by the majority. They would obviously have bitterness, and alternative motivations.
The Arab Muslims are struggling with their irrational hatreds, especially their hatred of Jews. They are struggling to accept their lower status, in the human community. They cannot lead the world through their issues. Why give a test to a people who cannot conceivably pass it. Moral challenges are mostly supposed to fall within a persons range. Or a peoples range.
 Neither the Arab Muslim nations nor the white gentile nations support real free speech. What is exposed to them, should be limited to tests that they can pass, or support the dissemination of truths that they can accept. Sure there are realities of the world that we have to deal with, like Jews getting gigantic ratings, and being the talk of the world. But we should try to be moral and wise where possible.
 For Arab Muslims, and leftists, screaming free Palestine, is a war cry, against Jews that we know they have lost control over many times before. They are likely to do so again. If it is our desire to get as far as we can in the discourse, which I think that would be the most moral thing to do, then we should recognize free Palestine as a slogan for people incapable of slogans. No. From the river to the sea could introduce the notion of self control, assuming the west can enforce it. But you cant stop all slogans. Palestine is made up, to cover up for Arab Muslim racism against Jews. But for Arab Muslims, their moral standard is evil hatred of all Jews, ascending to supporting the land rights of palestinians. A level most Arab Muslims have not achieved.
How are we supposed to manage indulging and elevating Arab Muslims and leftists, who are bordering violence, and indulging in abuse against Jews? Through terrorizing their community, and forbidding their organization. Which justifies forbidding the chant free Palestine. The alternative right is capable of more reasonable conversation, so they should be permitted to have it. But they shouldn’t dominate national policy, in a semi democratic nation.
Maybe the hatred of the alternative right will be induced, if America strikes Iran. Maybe it will take them years to get them back, if ever. Maybe America dropping the ball on foreign relations due to the Jews is the price America must pay?
In war time, crazy pacificists, and minorities who hate the majority that protest the war effort, are shut down. The right wing heart usually supports that. They just don’t have a concept in the American narrative about how important racial justice, globalism, and Jews are. That and they hate Jewish inequality.
I wonder if instead of claiming that free Palestine is a call for genocide, we shouldn’t identify Muslims and leftists as having violent anti Jewish inclinations, that should be treated with disdain and concern. It is not possible to be that clear in America yet. Maybe it should be, or maybe the call of free Palestine should be associated with racism, and allow that ambiguity, to permit it to be more palatable to sell to the American public.
 Well meaning Americans, and many left wingers and their leaders, know darn well how explosive Jew hatred is. They have a sense of how unstable Muslims are, including some leftists. They can vote for a policy that is flawed, but doesn’t require them to identify Muslims or leftists as the problem, just the slogan. Some times doing what’s moral is embracing clearly flawed policies. To many Americans might not get it, but its probably the best way forward to manage the situation. In G-d I trust.