ידידיה שטרן, פרופסור למשפטים, טוען כי היועץ המשפטי לממשלה, כעורך דין מקצועי שאינו נבחר עלי ידי הציבור, ממלא תפקיד קרדינלי במערכת המשפט הישראלית. לדבריו, היועמ"ש אינו רק משרת ציבור אלא גם בעל סמכויות נרחבות, שחלקן אף עולות על אלה של בג"ץ במובנים מסוימים.
שטרן מציין כי היועץ המשפטי לממשלה, באמצעות משרדו שמאכלס עורכי דין בעלי ידע ויכולת, אמור להחזיק במומחיות ייחודית המאפשרת לו לפרש את החוק ולפעול במסגרת סמכויותיו כדי להטיל וטו על החלטות הממשלה. עם זאת, הוא מדגיש כי עוצמתה של החברה הדמוקרטית טמונה בממשלה, שמחזיקה בכוח הגדול ביותר בשלטון. לשם כך, ישנה חשיבות בכך שיתקיים איזון בין הכוח המבצעי של הממשלה לבין יכולת ההתערבות של היועץ המשפטי, אשר מפקח על פעולתה.
על פי שטרן, ניתן לטעון כי היועץ המשפטי לממשלה, במיוחד כיום, חורג לפעמים מגבולות תפקידו. אך לדעתו, הדרך הנכונה להתמודד עם סוגיה כזו היא לפנות לבג"ץ שיכריע בשאלת הסמכויות.
שוב אתם מראיינים את פרוספר שטרן?
החסרי פשיסטים אנחנו?
המעמד של היוומש״ית אין לו אח ורע בשום דמוקרטיה
אבל מיהם כבר הבריטים, האמריקאים ושאר דמוקרטים חובבנים לעומת פרוספר שלנו?
אולי תשלחו אותו לשכנעאת הקונגרס בוושינגטון ואולי אפילו את טראמפ?
העיקר שחררו אותנו ממנו ושכמותו במטוטא
תודה
When you see a super beautiful girl, it is kind of ridiculous, that we are expected to have a conversation about the weather with them. They look spectacular, our minds fill with thoughts of sex and beauty, and the joy of touching such a fantastic looking creature. Then we are supposed to act like everything is normal, we really are interested in talking about mundane things with her, we aren’t distracted in our thoughts or discourse pertaining to her presence. They haven’t disrupted the entire discourse of the men. They even walk around showing tremendous cleavage, making the act of pretending to be normal even more absurd.
The Muslims might take things to far, but a great many people in the west are full of bull in their thinking. Just because A woman has a right to dress how she likes, doesn’t mean that she gets to dictate gender dynamics. We are all born into a society, with thousands of biological and spiritual rules that we must consider and comply with, so should women. For the truly spectacular looking women dressing modestly will only minimize the discomforts of their plight. But the benefits of being beautiful far outweigh the burdens and dangers. In G-d I trust.
It serves as a reminder, as to how much danger the Jewish people are in, in the sense that the majority of the American media will not report this, and the vast number of Americans who disapprove of the Jewish people, and the actions of Israel, will never hear this, and will not care if they do. It is hard to solve the problem of what do you do when the majority of the media is catering to emotion, the extreme revulsion some Americans have towards Jews, and the slight dislike of Jews that many more Americans have for Jews.
Most Americans are influenced by emotion, most media caters to emotion. It is normal for people to dislike those who are unequal to them. Below their walking around moral standard, and for many below their thinking moral standard. The scale of Jewish inequality further exacerbates the hostile feelings towards Jews. It is natural for gentiles, even white gentiles, to dislike Jews who they see as in charge and lying about it.
In A nation that it is not permissible to talk about who is in charge, and how much power they have. It is natural for gentiles, forced to live under injustice, abuse, poverty and pain, due to the weakness of their community, their union. Due to the weakness of the relationship they have with their rulers. All directed at the Jews, because that is better than allowing it to be directed at the people in charge, and besides, exposing the people in charge, will cause a break down in the system anyways, which will result in the Jews being able to escape.
Hashem has made the inevitable conclusion of resisting tyranny and oppression, the confrontation of the people in charge, which is intertwined with Jewish identity and inequality. No amount of effort or love can change the fact of the Jewish identities incompatibility with living with the gentiles. White or non white. Just wait till Jewish inequality is openly discussed. You think you should rule over us? They will ask. Their fears, their morality, expressed by the most hostile of their people, within the parameters of the violent members of white gentile society influencing the discourse. A white homogenous community, is from a different time. Certainly, America is undefendable. But what chance is a clear appeal to escape like the one made in this article, ever to be printed? Probably a covert appeal to release the Jew haters. In G-d I trust.
To be blind to the current significance of the Temple on the Mount, to the Jewish people today, is wild foolishness. The symbolic importance of it, is unmatched on earth. Sad that so many religious and secular Jews, are distracted from that fact due to some religious technicality, as if it cannot be superseded by a greater truth.
Sad that many secular Jews are paralyzed by demonization of religious people, being deceived into thinking that helping the religious, harms their rights and freedoms, when the reality is that the Temple on the Mount, represents the Jewish identity, that Muslims wish to desecrate, in an act and declaration of dominance. An assertion of Jewish rights, that leftist want to forbid, as a sacrifice to their emotional desire to appease the muslims.
Furthermore, if secular Jews do not defend the rights of religious Jews, then many religious Jews will not defend the rights of secular Jews, and the result will be a weak people, easy to conquer. We Jews can work out freedoms and influence for all Jewish belief systems, and what we work out will be drastically better than what the red green alliance will impose on us.
I still worry about the Israeli government not being willing to overthrow hamas, and what Ben Gavir's rejoining of the government might mean, if they don’t. An end to democracy, like is officially happening in Europe? No pretense of a radical right like Ben Gavir or Feiglin, talking endlessly about killing mass numbers of civilians, cutting off their water and food, like the most foolish politician or diplomat in the world?
There are so many stories in America of FBI infiltration into right wing groups, with their agents speaking for those groups, clearly saying things that misrepresent their beliefs and interests. I hope the Israeli media begins incorporating that perspective into their narrative. Musk is literally talking about arresting these NGO groups that openly pay for violence on the streets of america. While Ben Gavir and other right wing politicians will not say it is crazy that we are still negotiating with hamas a year and a half after 1700 Jews have been killed, for them to surrender. Go and get them, and call for the palestinian authority to be disbanded. But we have no such level of representation. Accommodation for tyranny describes our situation. Just look at the state of Jewish groups, supposedly representing the Jewish people.
But this action of going on the Temple on the Mount pleases me, and I still hope that Netanyahu and Ben Gavir are doing all they can to overthrow hamas, and occupy Gaza, so we do not have to go through another October 7th, because we do not accept responsibility for the world as it is. Not the fair one we like to demand it should be. In G-d I trust.
You can tell that many of the leftist politicians of America and Europe, as well as much of the western media, have much in common with tyrannical regimes like Stalin and chairman Mao, because the pretend to be clueless about courts, judges and the judicial system ever having become corrupted, or ever have been used by supporters of tyranny before. If they were reasonable honest people, who cared about justice for the people of their nation, then they would argue why it was reasonable to bar the most popular presidential candidates for nations. They prefer not to, and instead have foolish and small minded conversations about legal technicalities, that are wholly insufficient to explain the magnitude of the action being taken.
I wonder if the people in charge are defending the world from being destroyed? That would be a good guide to understand some of the limitations of the free speech ideas available. But I don’t think that is right. The old order was based on ignorance, and an unsolvable leftist conundrum, where much of the population imagined that inequality existed, because there wasn’t enough kindness in the world. While the rest of society, either thought it was the best way to keep peace and order, or it was the only environment that could be established, where people could be talked to about inequality.
There were people who disapproved of the level of censorship on the topic, who believed that the truth should be thrown in peoples faces, forcing those who would listen, to do so. That may be what ultimately happens, in the end for sure there will still be people who don’t know, or don’t accept the truth. I suppose a distracting thought, is the system legitimate? Or will the systems balance of power between good and bad, lead to the destruction of the censoring power, regardless of the immorality of the policies of the regime.
Considering Le Pen was barred from running for the Prime Minister position in France, the position she was the lead candidate for, I hope that means we have reached a point of great progress. The left literally write articles saying they should use law fair, to overrule the popular vote, and then they pretend, they have never heard of the concept of authoritarian powers using the judiciary, to impose and conceal their undemocratic demands. I imagine it would be good for Le Pen’s team to take a moment, and collectively declare, that they understand, that sometimes tyranny cannot be defeated by morality. Sometimes it takes a bit longer, for people to understand, but speaking clearly, as to what is moral, can make evil look bad, and expedite its defeat.
Steal the narrative from the propagandist, and express the truth, even though almost all the media in France, is going with the narrative, that because of some law, or technicality, or other, Le Pen must be forbidden from running for office.
When your adversary makes an attack that is meant to be a distraction, that has little or no validity, answer back with a positive reaffirmation of your own point. Usually the rhythm of discourse, ‘fair conversation’, means you need to answer back a snide remark, with another superficial remark a couple of times, before you can disregard them, or insult their justifications for disagreeing with your point.
It is possible that Jews and white gentiles are on the same side. But they seem wildly leftist, and they love hearing about how they are right. Then again, the media is massively compromised. My faith in the system is not very great. It could easily be a situation where the evil must be overcome, and not one where we win our right to freedom. But what does that mean. Real violence is already a monopoly of the people in control. Make your argument, and pray to G-d that He entices the people running the ‘system’, to grant us freedom. The freedom to know, understand, cling to, and serve our G-d. All the systems He has designed and implemented, so our punishment and torment can end.
One of the advantages of being a teacher, is that children are very honest, they don’t understand all the complicated reasons adults have to lie, so they ask direct questions. They need to understand that they are not so smart, they do not know everything there is to know, an attitude of pessimism and defense is a better posture to face the world with. Most men and women are corrupted, most are in pain, and walking around with immoral intentions. Carefully, and patiently, you should decide who you spend your life with, your career, your financial decisions. The tv will try everything they can to get you excited, and buy stuff you don’t need, and can’t afford.
Going back to the joke about the women being ego maniacs, because you could build a woman a bathroom, with angels flying with wings, gently fanning them with tree branches, holding bowls of fruit, in a room with flowing water and marble, and the women will all say they deserve this. They may even redecorate, so they can claim ownership to their friends. But I don’t think its because they are egomaniacs, I think they have a different perspective of giving pleasure. When you try to make someone happy, you don’t think about do they deserve it, you think about maximizing it, because to be happy, means to fill others with joy. To give is pleasurable, and satisfying, in addition to receiving being enjoyable. They say they are all 10’s, because the man who loves them will tell them they are the most important person on earth to them. Just like he and his children are the most important people on earth to her. G-d has made us different, value and perceive things differently, to fulfill our roles. In G-d I trust.
לא ידוע שהדברים שאומר הפרופ' על תפקיד היועמ"ש, נמצאים בחוק. ניסים שר המשפטים לשעבר טוען שהיועמ"שים לדורותיהם ניכסו לעצמם שנה אחר שנה עוד ועוד כוח. שום דבר לא בחוק באופן ברור ומפורש